Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5g Vs Note 10 Plus

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G vs Note 10 Plus

Самсунг Галакси Z Flip3 5G VS Самсунг Галакси Ноте 10 Плюс Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G) that was released on August 11 2021 against the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus which is powered by Exynos 9 Octa 9825 and came out 25 months before. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G
  • Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.1)
  • 27% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (700K versus 553K)
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 2750 MHz
  • Delivers 18% higher peak brightness (938 against 796 nits)
  • The phone is 2-years and 1-month newer
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Shows 38% longer battery life (27:48 vs 20:09 hours)
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 4300 vs 3300 mAh
  • The rear camera has a 2x optical zoom
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1000GB
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Thinner bezels – 7.69% more screen real estate
  • 16% higher pixel density (495 vs 426 PPI)

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G 89 Galaxy Note 10 Plus 75 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G 76 Galaxy Note 10 Plus 65 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G 63 Galaxy Note 10 Plus 75 Camera Photo and video recording quality Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G 74 Galaxy Note 10 Plus 80 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G 82 Galaxy Note 10 Plus 89 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G 76 Galaxy Note 10 Plus 74

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G Price Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G vs Galaxy Note 10 Plus

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED Super AMOLED
Size 6.7 inches 6.8 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2640 pixels 1440 x 3040 pixels
Aspect ratio 21.9:9 19:9
PPI 426 ppi 495 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Max rated brightness 850 nits 700 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1200 nits -
HDR support Yes HDR10+ Yes HDR10+
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Corning Gorilla Glass 6
Screen-to-body ratio 84.7% 92.39%
Display features - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 95.3% 95.4%
PWM 242 Hz 250 Hz
Response time 6.5 ms 3.6 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto) Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G +18% 938 nits Galaxy Note 10 Plus 796 nits Sources: NotebookCheck [3] [4]

Design and build

Height 166 mm (6.54 inches) 162.3 mm (6.39 inches)
Width 72.2 mm (2.84 inches) 77.2 mm (3.04 inches)
Thickness 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) 7.9 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 183 gramm (6.46 oz) 196 gramm (6.91 oz)
Waterproof IPX8 IP68
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White Black Gray Green Pink White Black Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes in home button Yes in-display
Screen-to-body ratio Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G 84.7% Galaxy Note 10 Plus +9% 92.39%

Performance

Tests of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G and Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus in the benchmarks
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9825
Max. clock 2840 MHz 2730 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 2 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78) - 1 core at 2.84 GHz: Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1) - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A75 - 2 cores at 2.73 GHz: M4
L3 cache 4 MB 2 MB
Lithography process 5 nanometers 7 nanometers
Graphics Adreno 660 Mali G76 MP12
GPU clock 840 MHz 770 MHz
FLOPS ~1720 GFLOPS ~652 GFLOPS
Memory
RAM size 8 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2750 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.0
Memory card No MicroSD
Memory card max. size - Up to 1000 GB

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G +36% 983 Galaxy Note 10 Plus 721 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G +34% 3473 Galaxy Note 10 Plus 2590 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G +27% 700990 Galaxy Note 10 Plus 553088
CPU 206991 139273
GPU 227511 177762
Memory 138296 118225
UX 123353 114971
Total score 700990 553088
3DMark Wild Life Performance Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G +36% 4573 Galaxy Note 10 Plus 3359
Stability 70% 98%
Graphics test 27 FPS 20 FPS
Graphics score 4573 3359
PCMark 3.0 score 13708 9204
AnTuTu Android Ranking List Sources: 3DMark [3] [4] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 12) Android 9.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 12)
ROM One UI 4.1.1 One UI 4.0
OS size 29 GB 31.6 GB

Battery

Specifications
Capacity 3300 mAh 4300 mAh
Charge power 25 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (10 W) Yes Qi/PMA (15 W)
Reverse charging Yes (wireless) Yes (wireless)
Fast charging Yes (40% in 30 min) Yes Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (65% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:30 hr 1:05 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 06:58 hr 07:47 hr
Watching video 09:12 hr 14:19 hr
Gaming 03:32 hr 04:55 hr
Standby 64 hr 97 hr
General battery life Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G 20:09 hr Galaxy Note 10 Plus +38% 27:48 hr

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones
Main camera
Matrix 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 4000 x 3000 4000 x 3000
Zoom Digital Optical 2x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 240FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (720p) 960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 123° 123°
Lenses 2 (12 MP + 12 MP) 4 (12 MP + 12 MP + 16 MP + 0 MP)
Wide (main) lens - 12 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 27 mm - Pixel size: 1.4 micron - Sensor: 1/2.55" Sony IMX563 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization - 12 MP - Aperture: f/1.5 - 2.4 - Focal length: 27 mm - Pixel size: 1.4 micron - Sensor: 1/2.55" Samsung SAK2L4 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization
Telephoto lens - - 12 MP - Aperture: f/2.1 - Focal length: 52 mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/3.6" Samsung S5K3M3 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization
Ultra-wide lens - 12 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 22 mm - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/3.06" Sony IMX258 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - 16 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 12 mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/3.1" Samsung S5K3P9 (ISOCELL CMOS)
Depth lens - Yes
Camera features - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G from DxOMark Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus from DxOMark
Selfie camera
Megapixels 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Image resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Aperture f/2.4 f/1.6
Focal length 26 mm 26 mm
Pixel size 1.22 microns 1.22 microns
Sensor type Exmor-RS CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.2" 1/2.65"
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS

DxOMark camera tests

Photo quality Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G +1% 127 Galaxy Note 10 Plus 126 Video quality Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G +3% 101 Galaxy Note 10 Plus 98 Generic camera score Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G +1% 118 Galaxy Note 10 Plus 117

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot
Bluetooth version 5.1 5
Bluetooth features LE A2DP PBAP/PAB PAN OPP MAP LE HSP HID HFP DIP AVRCP A2DP
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.1
USB features - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode - Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 20 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test Max. loudness Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G +3% 88.6 dB Galaxy Note 10 Plus 85.7 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced August 2021 August 2019
Release date August 2021 August 2019
SAR (head) 0.86 W/kg 0.19 W/kg
SAR (body) 1.58 W/kg 1.4 W/kg
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint
*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display and performance are more important to you then choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G. But if the battery life camera connectivity and design are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G 6 (66.7%) Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus 3 (33.3%) Vote Total votes: 9

Related comparisons

1. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G or Apple iPhone 13 2. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G or S22 Ultra 3. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G or A53 5G 4. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G or Galaxy Z Flip 4 5. Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus or S10 Plus 6. Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus or S21 Ultra 7. Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus or Galaxy S22 8. Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus or Note 10 9. Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus or Galaxy Z Flip 4

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net


Android Samsung Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave
Android Samsung Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave


 Samsung Refrigerators 4 door with touch screen
Samsung Refrigerators 4 door with touch screen


Blur Phone Wallpaper 1080x2340 - 111
Blur Phone Wallpaper 1080x2340 - 111


UnBricking TV by EEPROM Reset - SamyGO
UnBricking TV by EEPROM Reset - SamyGO


25 amazing Italian bathroom tile designs ideas and pictures 2020
25 amazing Italian bathroom tile designs ideas and pictures 2020


 Samsung Galaxy A32 Wallpapers HD
Samsung Galaxy A32 Wallpapers HD


 Samsung Wave 723 Hintergrundbilder
Samsung Wave 723 Hintergrundbilder


2014 Most Beautiful Object in South Africa Design Indaba
2014 Most Beautiful Object in South Africa Design Indaba




Xiaomi 12s Pro Vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

Xiaomi 12S Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

Ксиаоми 12S Про VS Самсунг Галакси С22 Ультра (Snapdragon) Xiaomi 12S Pro Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.73-inch Xiaomi 12S Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1) that was released on July 4 2022 against the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and came out 5 months before. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 12S Pro
  • 17% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1098K versus 940K)
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Weighs 24 grams less
  • 11% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 1340 and 1209 points
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • The rear camera has a 10x optical zoom
  • Comes with 400 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
  • More recent OS version: Android 13 versus 12
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness 12S Pro 96 Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 95 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games 12S Pro 96 Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 88 Battery Battery life charging type and speed 12S Pro 89 Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 93 Camera Photo and video recording quality 12S Pro 77 Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 89 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission 12S Pro 84 Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 92 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation 12S Pro 87 Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 89

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Xiaomi 12S Pro Price Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: 12S Pro vs Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

Display

Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED
Size 6.73 inches 6.8 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels 1440 x 3088 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 521 ppi 500 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Max rated brightness 1000 nits 830 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1500 nits 1750 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10+ Yes HDR10+
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Gorilla Glass Victus Plus
Screen-to-body ratio 89.6% 90.2%
Display features - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% -
PWM 364 Hz -
Response time 2 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto) 12S Pro 753 nits Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) n/a Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.6 mm (6.44 inches) 163.3 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 74.6 mm (2.94 inches) 77.9 mm (3.07 inches)
Thickness 8.16 mm (0.32 inches) 8.9 mm (0.35 inches)
Weight 204 gramm (7.2 oz) 228 gramm (8.04 oz)
Waterproof No IP68
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White Green Purple White Black Gray Blue Green Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes in-display Yes in-display
Screen-to-body ratio 12S Pro 89.6% Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) +1% 90.2%

Performance

Tests of Xiaomi 12S Pro and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) in the benchmarks
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Max. clock 3190 MHz 3000 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.75 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-X2 - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X2
L3 cache 6 MB 6 MB
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Graphics Adreno 730 Adreno 730
GPU clock 900 MHz 818 MHz
FLOPS - ~2236 GFLOPS
Memory
RAM size 8 12 GB 8 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory clock 3200 MHz -
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 128 256 512 GB 128 256 512 1024 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) 12S Pro +11% 1340 Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 1209 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) 12S Pro +27% 4174 Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 3288 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 12S Pro +17% 1098122 Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 940212
CPU 243697 220415
GPU 478120 408475
Memory 191931 157509
UX 184166 151964
Total score 1098122 940212
3DMark Wild Life Performance 12S Pro +26% 10112 Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 8027
Stability 62% 56%
Graphics test 60 FPS 48 FPS
Graphics score 10112 8027
PCMark 3.0 score 13471 13039
AnTuTu Android Phone Scores (13th and 43rd place) Sources: 3DMark [3] [4] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system Android 12 Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 13)
ROM MIUI 13 One UI 5.0
OS size 32 GB -

Battery

Specifications
Capacity 4600 mAh 5000 mAh
Charge power 120 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging Yes (wireless) Yes (wireless)
Fast charging Yes (50% in 19 min) Yes (50% in 20 min)
Full charging time 0:19 hr 0:59 hr

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones
Main camera
Matrix 50 megapixels 108 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 12000 x 9000
Zoom Optical 2x Optical 10x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 24FPS Up to 24FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 115° 120°
Lenses 3 (50 MP + 50 MP + 50 MP) 4 (108 MP + 10 MP + 10 MP + 12 MP)
Wide (main) lens - 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.9 - Focal length: 24 mm - Pixel size: 1.22 micron - Sensor: 1/1.28" Sony IMX707 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization - 108 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 24 mm - Sensor: 1/1.33" Samsung S5KHM3 (ISOCELL Plus CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization
Telephoto lens - 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.9 - Focal length: 50 mm - Pixel size: 0.64 micron - Sensor: 1/2.76" Samsung S5KJN1 (ISOCELL Plus CMOS) - Phase autofocus - 10 MP - Aperture: f/4.9 - Focal length: 230 mm - Sensor: 1/3.52" Sony IMX574 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization
Ultra-wide lens - 50 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Pixel size: 0.64 micron - Sensor: 1/2.76" Samsung S5KJN1 (CMOS) - 12 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 13 mm - Sensor: 1/2.55" Sony IMX563 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Camera features - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support
Samples - Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) from DxOMark
Selfie camera
Megapixels 32 megapixels 40 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 7864 x 5200
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.2
Focal length 26 mm 26 mm
Pixel size 0.7 microns -
Sensor type CMOS -
Sensor size 1/3" 1/2.82"
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS

DxOMark camera tests

Photo quality 12S Pro n/a Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 136 Video quality 12S Pro n/a Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 111 Generic camera score 12S Pro n/a Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 131

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS NAVIC GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 20 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test Max. loudness 12S Pro 85 dB Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced July 2022 February 2022
Release date July 2022 February 2022
Sensors - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint - Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint
*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera connectivity and design are more important to you then choose the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon). But if the performance is more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi 12S Pro.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Xiaomi 12S Pro 6 (54.5%) Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 5 (45.5%) Vote Total votes: 11

Related comparisons

1. Xiaomi 12 Pro vs 12S Pro 2. Xiaomi 12 vs 12S Pro 3. Xiaomi 12S vs 12S Pro 4. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 5. Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus vs S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 6. Vivo X80 vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 vs S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 8. Google Pixel 7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net


 Xiaomi s valuation plunges as shipments dive - Mobile World Live
Xiaomi s valuation plunges as shipments dive - Mobile World Live


Top 5 Xiaomi Devices that Indians Eagerly Waiting for
Top 5 Xiaomi Devices that Indians Eagerly Waiting for


The New York Times Gets Xiaomi Way Way Wrong
The New York Times Gets Xiaomi Way Way Wrong


 Xiaomi China s favourite - News - What Mobile
Xiaomi China s favourite - News - What Mobile


Chinese manufacturer Xiaomi more than doubles sales as it begins
Chinese manufacturer Xiaomi more than doubles sales as it begins


 Xiaomi smartphone shipments cross 70 million in 2017 beats target
Xiaomi smartphone shipments cross 70 million in 2017 beats target


 Xiaomi unveils new flagship smartphones
Xiaomi unveils new flagship smartphones


 Xiaomi Users Insights in 2015 China Internet Watch
Xiaomi Users Insights in 2015 China Internet Watch


 Xiaomi espionnerait les utilisateurs de ses smartphones via des backdoors
Xiaomi espionnerait les utilisateurs de ses smartphones via des backdoors


Wallpaper Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha Android 10 4K Hi-Tech 22176
Wallpaper Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha Android 10 4K Hi-Tech 22176


 Xiaomi Mi TV 4S de 50 pulgadas 4K y HDR por s lo 317 euros
Xiaomi Mi TV 4S de 50 pulgadas 4K y HDR por s lo 317 euros


Sing 2016 Phone Wallpaper Moviemania in 2021 Disney phone
Sing 2016 Phone Wallpaper Moviemania in 2021 Disney phone


Landscape Phone Wallpaper 135 - 1080x2340
Landscape Phone Wallpaper 135 - 1080x2340


Apple iPhone SE 2020 Stock Wallpaper 1242x2688 - 11
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Stock Wallpaper 1242x2688 - 11


Dark Phone Wallpaper 290 - 1080x2340
Dark Phone Wallpaper 290 - 1080x2340


Fall Phone Wallpaper - 053
Fall Phone Wallpaper - 053


Water Sunset Landscapes Beach - 1920 x 1200
Water Sunset Landscapes Beach - 1920 x 1200




Oppo Realme Narzo 50i Vs Realme C25

Oppo Realme Narzo 50i vs Realme C25

Оппо Реалми Нарзо 50i VS Оппо Реалми C25 Oppo Realme Narzo 50i Oppo Realme C25

Here we compared two budget smartphones: the 6.5-inch Oppo Realme Narzo 50i (with Unisoc SC9863A) that was released on September 24 2021 against the Oppo Realme C25 which is powered by MediaTek Helio G70 and came out 6 months before. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Oppo Realme Narzo 50i
  • The phone is 6-months newer
Reasons to consider the Oppo Realme C25
  • 2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (207K versus 105K)
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Modern USB Type-C port
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 5 wireless networks
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5)
  • Supports 18W fast charging
  • More energy-efficient CPU – MediaTek Helio G70
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • 2.7x faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 343 and 126 points

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Realme Narzo 50i 57 Realme C25 55 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Realme Narzo 50i 19 Realme C25 30 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Realme Narzo 50i 65 Realme C25 85 Camera Photo and video recording quality Realme Narzo 50i 43 Realme C25 56 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Realme Narzo 50i 49 Realme C25 71 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Realme Narzo 50i 46 Realme C25 56

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Oppo Realme Narzo 50i Price Oppo Realme C25 Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Realme Narzo 50i vs Realme C25

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 6.5 inches 6.5 inches
Resolution 720 x 1600 pixels 720 x 1600 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 270 ppi 270 ppi
Refresh rate 60 Hz 60 Hz
Max rated brightness 400 nits 480 nits
HDR support No No
Screen protection Tempered glass Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Screen-to-body ratio 80.8% 81.7%

Design and build

Height 165.2 mm (6.5 inches) 164.5 mm (6.48 inches)
Width 76.4 mm (3.01 inches) 75.9 mm (2.99 inches)
Thickness 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) 9.6 mm (0.38 inches)
Weight 195 gramm (6.88 oz) 209 gramm (7.37 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Plastic Plastic
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors Black Green Gray Blue
Fingerprint scanner No Yes rear
Screen-to-body ratio Realme Narzo 50i 80.8% Realme C25 +1% 81.7%

Performance

Tests of Oppo Realme Narzo 50i and Oppo Realme C25 in the benchmarks
SoC
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A MediaTek Helio G70
Max. clock 1600 MHz 2000 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 1.6 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 6 cores at 1.7 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75
L3 cache - 1 MB
Lithography process 28 nanometers 12 nanometers
Graphics PowerVR GE8322 Mali-G52 2EEMC2
GPU clock - 820 MHz
FLOPS - ~54.6 GFLOPS
Memory
RAM size 2 4 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 1800 MHz 1866 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 32 64 GB 64 128 GB
Storage type eMMC 5.1 eMMC 5.1
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max. size Up to 256 GB Up to 256 GB

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Realme Narzo 50i 126 Realme C25 +172% 343 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Realme Narzo 50i 476 Realme C25 +178% 1324 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Realme Narzo 50i 105864 Realme C25 +96% 207601
CPU 30324 71576
GPU 15177 32528
Memory 30018 47070
UX 29587 56283
Total score 105864 207601
3DMark Wild Life Performance Realme Narzo 50i n/a Realme C25 594 Sources: 3DMark [3] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system Android 11 Android 11
ROM Realme Go UI Realme UI 2.0

Battery

Specifications
Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charge power 10 W 18 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Fast charging No Yes (40% in 65 min)
Full charging time 2:56 hr 2:50 hr

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones
Main camera
Matrix 8 megapixels 48 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 8000 x 6000
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion No -
Lenses 1 (8 MP) 3 (48 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP)
Wide (main) lens - 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.0 - Phase autofocus - 48 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Phase autofocus
Macro lens - - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Pixel size: 1.75 micron - Sensor: 1/5" Omnivision OV02B10 (CMOS)
Depth lens - - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Pixel size: 1.75 micron - Sensor: 1/5" GalaxyCore GC02M1 (CMOS)
Camera features - - Bokeh mode - Pro mode
Selfie camera
Megapixels 5 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 2560 x 1960 3264 x 2448
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length - 26 mm
Pixel size - 1.12 microns
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size - 1/4"
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 4.2 5
Bluetooth features LE A2DP LE A2DP
USB type Micro USB USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo GPS GLONASS Beidou
NFC* No Depends on the region
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 4 7
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers Mono Mono
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Category Budget Budget
Announced September 2021 March 2021
Release date October 2021 March 2021
Sensors - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint
*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data we think that the Oppo Realme C25 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Oppo Realme Narzo 50i 0 (0%) Oppo Realme C25 1 (100%) Vote Total votes: 1

Related comparisons

1. Oppo Realme Narzo 50i vs Oppo Realme Narzo 50A 2. Oppo Realme Narzo 50i vs Xiaomi Redmi 10C 3. Oppo Realme Narzo 50i vs Oppo Realme C31 4. Oppo Realme Narzo 50i vs Oppo Realme C30 5. Oppo Realme C25 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C 6. Oppo Realme C25 vs Oppo Realme C25s 7. Oppo Realme C25 vs Oppo Realme C21 8. Oppo Realme C25 vs Oppo Realme C35 9. Oppo Realme C25 vs Oppo Realme C30

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net


 Oppo
Oppo


 Oppo News - The Techno Diary - The Techno Diary
Oppo News - The Techno Diary - The Techno Diary


Top 10 Smartphones in the Philippines for December 2020 Pinoy Techno
Top 10 Smartphones in the Philippines for December 2020 Pinoy Techno


 OPPO s next flagship may feature custom-made Snapdragon 870 - Gizmochina
OPPO s next flagship may feature custom-made Snapdragon 870 - Gizmochina


 OPPO surpasses Apple by sales value in India - Gizmochina
OPPO surpasses Apple by sales value in India - Gizmochina


Specs for upcoming Oppo N1 Mini leak Oppo N2 rumored to be in
Specs for upcoming Oppo N1 Mini leak Oppo N2 rumored to be in


 oppo - uluda s zl k
oppo - uluda s zl k


 OPPO Patent Show Foldable Screen Design - Technobaboy com
OPPO Patent Show Foldable Screen Design - Technobaboy com


 Oppo F19 Oppo A53s More Oppo Smartphones Prices Increased by Up to
Oppo F19 Oppo A53s More Oppo Smartphones Prices Increased by Up to


Fall Phone Wallpaper - 008
Fall Phone Wallpaper - 008


Huawei P50 Pro Stock Wallpaper - 10
Huawei P50 Pro Stock Wallpaper - 10


Huawei Magazine Wallpaper 091 - 1440x2560
Huawei Magazine Wallpaper 091 - 1440x2560


Waves Phone Wallpaper 039 - 1080x2340
Waves Phone Wallpaper 039 - 1080x2340


Autumn Phone Wallpaper - 062
Autumn Phone Wallpaper - 062


Cloud Phone Wallpaper 1440x2560 - 014
Cloud Phone Wallpaper 1440x2560 - 014


BayMax Wallpaper 13 - 4000x2000
BayMax Wallpaper 13 - 4000x2000




Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra Vs Apple Iphone 14 Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Самсунг Галакси С21 Ультра VS Эпл Айфон 14 Про Макс Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.8-inch Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (with Exynos 2100) that was released on January 14 2021 against the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max which is powered by Apple A16 Bionic and came out 20 months after. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 10x optical zoom
  • Comes with 677 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4323 mAh
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • 12% higher pixel density (515 vs 460 PPI)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus NVMe
  • Reverse charging feature
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
Reasons to consider the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
  • Shows 47% longer battery life (45:56 vs 31:14 hours)
  • Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
  • Delivers 71% higher peak brightness (1765 against 1030 nits)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • Apple releases software updates and supports their phones a few years longer than Samsung
  • The phone is 1-year and 8-months newer
  • 26% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (966K versus 765K)
  • 71% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 1905 and 1114 points

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Galaxy S21 Ultra 92 iPhone 14 Pro Max 94 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Galaxy S21 Ultra 81 iPhone 14 Pro Max 91 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Galaxy S21 Ultra 83 iPhone 14 Pro Max 93 Camera Photo and video recording quality Galaxy S21 Ultra 86 iPhone 14 Pro Max 87 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Galaxy S21 Ultra 95 iPhone 14 Pro Max 81 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Galaxy S21 Ultra 84 iPhone 14 Pro Max 90

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra Price Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Galaxy S21 Ultra vs iPhone 14 Pro Max

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED OLED
Size 6.8 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels 1290 x 2796 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 515 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Max rated brightness 1500 nits 1000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 1600 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10+ Yes Dolby Vision
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic Shield
Screen-to-body ratio 89.8% 88.3%
Display features - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.9%
PWM - 240 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto) Galaxy S21 Ultra 1030 nits iPhone 14 Pro Max +71% 1765 nits Sources: NotebookCheck [3] [4]

Design and build

Height 165.1 mm (6.5 inches) 160.7 mm (6.33 inches)
Width 75.6 mm (2.98 inches) 77.6 mm (3.06 inches)
Thickness 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) 7.85 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 227 gramm (8.01 oz) 240 gramm (8.47 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black Silver Gray Blue Black Silver Gold Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes in-display No
Screen-to-body ratio Galaxy S21 Ultra +2% 89.8% iPhone 14 Pro Max 88.3%

Performance

Tests of Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra and Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max in the benchmarks
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 2100 Apple A16 Bionic
Max. clock 2840 MHz 3460 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 6 (2 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 3 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A78 - 1 core at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-X1 - 4 cores at 2.02 GHz: Sawtooth - 2 cores at 3.46 GHz: Everest
Lithography process 5 nanometers 4 nanometers
Graphics Mali-G78 MP14 Apple GPU
GPU clock 760 MHz -
Memory
RAM size 12 16 GB 6 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory clock 2750 MHz -
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 128 256 512 GB 128 256 512 1024 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
Memory card No No

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Galaxy S21 Ultra 1114 iPhone 14 Pro Max +71% 1905 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Galaxy S21 Ultra 3533 iPhone 14 Pro Max +54% 5448 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Galaxy S21 Ultra 765800 iPhone 14 Pro Max +26% 966983
CPU 198194 242019
GPU 290543 407261
Memory 132758 167432
UX 138398 145864
Total score 765800 966983
3DMark Wild Life Performance Galaxy S21 Ultra 5221 iPhone 14 Pro Max +88% 9796
Stability 69% 82%
Graphics test 31 FPS 58 FPS
Graphics score 5221 9796
AnTuTu 9 Android Phone Scores Sources: 3DMark [3] [4] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 13) iOS 16 (Can be upgraded to iOS 16.0.3)
ROM One UI 5.0 -
OS size 26.4 GB -

Battery

Specifications
Capacity 5000 mAh 4323 mAh
Charge power 25 W 27 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) Yes (7.5 W)
Reverse charging Yes (wireless) No
Fast charging Yes (54% in 30 min) Yes (48% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:11 hr 1:52 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:13 hr 15:02 hr
Watching video 15:32 hr 21:10 hr
Gaming 05:26 hr 07:12 hr
Standby 98 hr 156 hr
General battery life Galaxy S21 Ultra 31:14 hr iPhone 14 Pro Max +47% 45:56 hr Phone Battery Life Ranking

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones
Main camera
Matrix 108 megapixels 48 megapixels
Image resolution 12000 x 9000 8000 x 6000
Zoom Optical 10x Optical 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 24FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 120°
Lenses 4 (108 MP + 10 MP + 10 MP + 12 MP) 4 (48 MP + 12 MP + 12 MP + 0 MP)
Wide (main) lens - 108 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Sensor: 1/1.33" Samsung S5KHM3 (ISOCELL Plus CMOS) - Laser autofocus - Optical stabilization - 48 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 24 mm - Pixel size: 1.22 micron - Sensor: 1/1.28" - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization
Telephoto lens - 10 MP - Aperture: f/4.9 - Focal length: 240 mm - Pixel size: 1.22 micron - Sensor: 1/2.65" Samsung S5K3J1 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization - 12 MP - Aperture: f/2.8 - Focal length: 77 mm - Sensor: 1/3.5" - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization
Ultra-wide lens - 12 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 13 mm - Pixel size: 1.4 micron - Sensor: 1/2.55" Sony IMX563 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - 12 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 13 mm - Sensor: 1/2.55" - Phase autofocus
Depth lens - Yes
Camera features - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra from DxOMark Photo samples of Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max from DxOMark
Selfie camera
Megapixels 40 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 7864 x 5200 4032 x 3024
Aperture f/2.2 f/1.9
Focal length 26 mm 23 mm
Pixel size 0.7 microns -
Sensor type ISOCELL CMOS -
Sensor size 1/2.65" 1/3.6"
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS

DxOMark camera tests

Photo quality Galaxy S21 Ultra 128 iPhone 14 Pro Max +12% 143 Video quality Galaxy S21 Ultra 98 iPhone 14 Pro Max +42% 139 Generic camera score Galaxy S21 Ultra 121 iPhone 14 Pro Max +21% 146

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.3
Bluetooth features LE A2DP LE
USB type USB Type-C -
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging - USB-Storage mode - USB-Host mode - OTG - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby -
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 24 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test Max. loudness Galaxy S21 Ultra 88 dB iPhone 14 Pro Max +1% 89 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced January 2021 September 2022
Release date February 2021 September 2022
SAR (head) 0.71 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.58 W/kg -
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Face recognition sensor
*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance software battery life and design are more important to you then choose the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max. But if the connectivity is more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 139 (65%) Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max 75 (35%) Vote Total votes: 214

Related comparisons

1. Galaxy S21 Ultra or iPhone 13 Pro Max 2. Galaxy S21 Ultra or Galaxy S22 Ultra 3. Galaxy S21 Ultra or Galaxy S22 Plus 4. Galaxy S21 Ultra or Galaxy A53 5G 5. Galaxy S21 Ultra or Pixel 7 Pro 6. iPhone 14 Pro Max or iPhone 12 Pro Max 7. iPhone 14 Pro Max or Galaxy S22 Ultra 8. iPhone 14 Pro Max or iPhone 11 Pro 9. iPhone 14 Pro Max or iPhone 14

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net


Android Samsung Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave
Android Samsung Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave


 Samsung Refrigerators 4 door with touch screen
Samsung Refrigerators 4 door with touch screen


Blur Phone Wallpaper 1080x2340 - 111
Blur Phone Wallpaper 1080x2340 - 111


UnBricking TV by EEPROM Reset - SamyGO
UnBricking TV by EEPROM Reset - SamyGO


25 amazing Italian bathroom tile designs ideas and pictures 2020
25 amazing Italian bathroom tile designs ideas and pictures 2020


 Samsung Galaxy A32 Wallpapers HD
Samsung Galaxy A32 Wallpapers HD


 Samsung Wave 723 Hintergrundbilder
Samsung Wave 723 Hintergrundbilder


2014 Most Beautiful Object in South Africa Design Indaba
2014 Most Beautiful Object in South Africa Design Indaba